Give me an M, Give me an O, Give me an O, Give me a C... Let's Go Communists and Cheats! I'm pretty sure many think those would be appropriate cheers for OSU: Open Source University, the newest kid on the block in higher education in 2012.
Did I just piss you off? Before you rant ~ I'm completely kidding about the Communist part, though I'm sure many out there feel exactly that way about open source learning products and platforms. Learning? For Free? For the MASSES??? From textbooks to full courses, free online educational resources are popping up on the inter-webs left and right and people have some OPINIONS about this, your truly included.
There are
REAL, amazing experiments currently happening in bringing education to the masses through the internet. But in years, these new online learning platforms could change the face of higher education, something that entire communities and economies of our country are built upon. As with many new creations, a rush to produce can sometimes lead to calamity. While providing college level material by college professors for free to the world is undoubtedly a great thing (as great as Khan Academy is, its just a dude with a camera... who made him an Art History, Economics and Thermodynamics expert?), I still wonder, is regulation where we need it to be with these new platforms?
I am filled with both amazement and trepidation that many schools around the world are joining the tide of online open source Higher Education. Paulo Friere would be so proud. But might we be rushing it?
In September of this year, The Chronicle of Higher Education (CHE) released
an article about Stanford University's new online Open Source University Platform called Class2Go. Currently, Stanford is offering two new MOOCS for fall term 2012 through
Class2Go in computer science/technology based disciplines, which is
along the lines of many other MOOCS out there.
Alphabet soup making you hungry? Familiarize yourself with this term.
MOOCS stands for massive open online courses. Stanford's Class2Go might be a great example of how to proceed in the experimentation phase we currently find ourselves in, as it is a collaboration between multiple constituents and has the capacity to be adapted and altered by outside users such as other universities. This is not Stanford's first foray into MOOCS as they have used Coursera and other platforms to approach this new educational product and market in the past.
I know you might be thinking, none of this is new... I remember when MIT and Harvard released OpenCourseWare and EdX way back when. But the main difference in modern MOOCS is that they are not just written copy or content anymore. MOOCS are actual courses in that they are attempting to assess comprehension and mastery and in some cases, create a space for multimedia learning and dialog.
Sounds pretty nifty, doesn't it? So far, completion of most of these online courses doesn't grant participants college credit. But that can't be too far off. Because this is a burgeoning field, there is nothing but research, opinions and commentary on all of this experimentation. Perhaps this is an over generalization but it seems the majority of proponents of MOOCS are non-academics while those in the ivory towers are a bit on edge. This makes a lot of sense if you think about the fear of their field falling out from under them. Nonetheless, this is a fast growing area of higher ed that will be both exciting and nerve-wracking to watch from the inside.
Curious to read more? The CHE offers a fairly comprehensive walk down the exploding path of Open Source University politics and platforms
here.
What do you think are the pros and the potential cons of expanding Open Source U?